Definition and Examples of Accismus in Rhetoric

Definition and Examples of Accismus in Rhetoric Accismus is aâ rhetorical term for shyness: a type of incongruity wherein an individual fakes an absence of enthusiasm for something that the person in question really wants. Bryan Garner takes note of that political up-and-comers some of the time take part in something like this strategy by proclaiming that they would actually preferably be accomplishing something different over being occupied with open life (Garners Modern English Usage, 2016). EtymologyFrom the Greek, hesitance Models and Observations We ramble calculates constantly without knowing it. For instance:YOU: Oh, you shouldnt have.If you truly mean it, that on the off chance that they give you one all the more appalling, sick fitting sweater youll need to execute them, they you have not utilized a figure. Be that as it may, if the blessing is another iPad and you can scarcely shield from running off and playing with it, at that point your gracious you-shouldnt have comprises a figure called shyness. Scrooges who let others take care of the check will in general utilize the bashfulness figure.(Jay Heinrichs, Thank You for Arguing, second ed. Three Rivers Press, 2013)My name is Elizabeth Urello. I as of now live in Greenpoint, Brooklyn. I don't want to be an essayist/entertainer/comic/dramatist/commonly recognized name/hotshot character, anything else than I want your great feeling. I don't urgently need more companions, and I am not gravely needing dates.(About Elizabeth, at the blog Accismus)Accismus and Courtship in Ma ya Angelous Heart of a WomanHe raised his voice, Bar, give us another like that other one, at that point dropped his voice. Let me know, for what reason would you say you are in solitude? Have the men gone blind?Although I realized it was a normal move in the seeking game, being a tease made me awkward. Each shy comment caused me to feel like a liar. I squirmed on the stool and chuckled and stated, Oh, stop.Thomas was smooth. He drove, I followed; at the best possible time he pulled back and I pulled forward; before the finish of our starting function, I had given him my location and acknowledged a solicitation to dinner.(Maya Angelou, The Heart of a Woman. Arbitrary House, 1981) Julius Caesars Use of Accismus. . . I saw Mark Antony offer him [Julius Caesar] a crownyet twas not a crown not one or the other, twas one of these coronetsand as I let you know, he put it by once; however, for all that, to my reasoning, he would fain have had it. At that point he offered it to him once more; at that point he put it by once more; at the same time, to my reasoning, he was opposed to lay his fingers off it. And afterward he offered it the third time; he put it the third time by; and still as he denied it, the rabblement hooted and applauded their dried out hands and hurled their sweat-soaked night-caps.(Casca in Act 1, scene 2 of Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare)Roone Arledges Use of Accismus to Encourage Howard Cosells Departure From ABC SportsIn the weeks following the Holmes-Cobb [boxing] fiasco, bits of gossip persevered that [sportscaster Howard Cosell] would adjust his perspective, under tension from ABC. However, rather than earlier years, there was no genu ine weight. Despite what might be expected, ABC was very glad to leave him be. Had Cosell decided to restore, the officials would have needed to oblige him, something nobody was anxious to do now. This being the circumstance, Roone Arledge [president of ABC Sports] could bear to humor him. Ringing up Cosell one day, he said bashfully, I comprehend youre not doing any progressively proficient fights.When Cosell consented, Arledge, significantly more hesitantly, asked, Youve read your agreement recently?Yes, Cosell stated, and I know Im in penetrate of agreement, Roone, and I comprehend that you reserve each privilege to excuse me from the company.Arledge, gnawing his lip, guaranteed him, Are you insane? I think youve made the best choice. Congratulations!Arledge had motivation to be complimentary. For him, and all of ABC Sports, the proper thing was Cosell so deliberately lifting from them the weight of excusing him.(Mark Ribowsky, Howard Cosell: The Man, the Myth, and the Transforma tion of American Sports. W.W. Norton, 2011) Exhibiting Humility: The Bishops RitualAppointing a religious administrator is a precarious business. To be a minister you need to have the Christian uprightness of quietude; nonetheless, on the off chance that you really are unassuming youll most likely think youre not deserving of being a cleric and turn the activity down. Regardless of whether you furtively believe that youd make an astonishing cleric and would glance superb in a miter, you cant simply come out and state it. It would look terrible. So you needed to rehearse a smidgen of accismus by reporting before the gathered organization of churchmen that youd actually rather not become a minister, or, in Latin, Nolo episcopari.When you had gravely declared this, as opposed to stating Oh well, that's all there is to it, I assume, the congregation chamber would ask you a subsequent time, and for a second time you would submissively answer Nolo episcopari. On the third go, you would state, Oh okay at that point, go on, or Volo ep iscopari or whatever line of consent. You would in this way have shown your modesty and got the job.However, it is appallingly imperative to keep check, as though you said Nolo episcopari a third time it would be accepted that you truly implied it and your odds of advancement would be perpetually scuppered. Its fairly like the Rule of the Bellman portrayed by Lewis Carroll in The Hunting of the Snark: What I reveal to you multiple times is true.(Mark Forsyth, Horologicon. Symbol Books, 2012) A Female Virtue in the Victorian EraThe cleaner the brilliant vessel, the more promptly is it twisted: the higher worth of ladies is sooner lost than that of men. . . .Nature herself has encircled these fragile spirits with an ever-present, in-conceived watch, with humility, both in talking and hearing. A lady requires no figure of eloquenceherself exceptedso regularly as that of accismus.** So rhetoricians term the figure by which one talks, without all aching, of the very items for which one feels the strongest.(Jean Paul, Levana: Or, The Doctrine of Education, 1848) Elocution: ak-SIZ-mus